Let’s start this session with another story.
A few years ago, a global retailer (if you think about it, you’ll probably know which one) set an ambitious goal: eliminate single-use plastic packaging across all product lines.
It sounded great. Bold. Timely. A clear signal of commitment to sustainability.
They announced it publicly, hired a sustainability team, put posters in stores and rallied the press.
But behind the scenes… the plan was vague. No one had properly mapped out what would replace the plastic, how much it would actually cost beyond estimates, what suppliers would need to change, how it would impact shelf life, logistics, or product pricing.
Within 18 months, the initiative collapsed. Not because it was a bad idea but because no one had really built it out properly.
Now compare that to a competitor in the same market. Instead of making a sweeping announcement, they started with pilots. One store, one region, five national products. They mapped cost implications, customer response, supplier barriers, packaging prototypes, marketing angles. They built the idea until it was robust enough to scale.
They rolled it out nationally, then globally.
Today, that second company is a case study in sustainable retail, and the first company is a cautionary tale.
This is the difference between having an idea and building an initiative.
And this next session is where that difference gets made.
You’ve generated bold thinking. Now it’s time to get sharper, more detailed, more deliberate.
No matter how exciting the idea sounds, it only adds value when it has shape, when it’s been stress-tested, and when it can be explained, costed, and delivered.
This session is about creating that bigger picture, and mapping what we’re imagining in more detail, so we can see where to focus, and if we have in fact prioritised the right ideas.